Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:10

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Psychopathic individuals recognize unfairness but are less likely to punish it - PsyPost
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Is it okay or problematic to be both Black and gay in society in the 21st century?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Michigan Cup starting lineup: Chase Briscoe wins third pole in a row - NBC Sports
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Mario Smash Football primed for Switch 2's growing GameCube library - Eurogamer
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why are white women dating more black guys than ever?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.